I really enjoyed this commercial, because it made me remember the product when I was buying shampoo and conditioner. Without this new concept, I do not think I would have selected this shampoo, that I hadn't heard about before then, to buy the product. Also, the commercial features multiple, beautiful women, also admitting that they were unaware of this new concept, making the epiphany brought on by this product more reliable. The commercial was chic, innovative, informing, and glamorous, and as far as grabbing their target market's attention, it was a job well done.
Popular Posts
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Hair Epiphany Changes Image of Shampoo
I really enjoyed this commercial, because it made me remember the product when I was buying shampoo and conditioner. Without this new concept, I do not think I would have selected this shampoo, that I hadn't heard about before then, to buy the product. Also, the commercial features multiple, beautiful women, also admitting that they were unaware of this new concept, making the epiphany brought on by this product more reliable. The commercial was chic, innovative, informing, and glamorous, and as far as grabbing their target market's attention, it was a job well done.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Reinvention Done Right
Having a female spokeswoman, such as Agron, who plays a sweet, conservative, accomplished high school girl on television, gives the product a unique impression that reaches out to a group beyond traditional gamers, and to people who many not know anything about video games, but interested in improving their artistic skills and sketching capabilities. The setting of the commercial, in a diner, with Agron sketching apple pie, shows the easy it is to use this product anywhere, any day. By using Dianna Agron, this commercial reaches out to all the viewers who follow the successful show, Glee. There are many cases where a brand should reinvent themselves, and there are many cases where a brand risks losing their following or their business by attempting to reinvent themselves. I don't think Nintendo lost consumers by this commercial, but definitely became more attractive to aspiring artists and those alike.
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Volkswagen Invisible No More
Volkswagen does a very nice job in this commercial to recognize their product's status within the market and playing the commercial in a way to set this new product apart from the rest. Growing up, I believed that Volkswagen created normal, affordable cars, but nothing spectacular. While the Beetle model was an iconic car, Volkswagen sometimes lacks in jerking the memories of new car owners when looking at competitors. This commercial implies that this is the car that everyone on the streets will stop to stare at, stop to admire. While the commercial doesn't say much about the numerical facts or safety tests, it intrigues the consumer, and forces them to remember to the commercial while also making them laugh.
Sunday, October 7, 2012
Fine Print Fuels Concerns
"Is 5-Hour ENERGY Right for You?" Commercial
This commercial is a perfect example of "weasel words", where the manufacturer suggests a positive meaning without making any guarantees. At first the ad seems positive with the large stack of reviews on the product, but who can tell if those are actual reviews or just a stack of paper with a couple reviews printed for the top. The spokesperson said, "Over 73% of doctors would recommend a low calorie energy supplement to their healthy patients who use energy supplements". She didn't say that 73% of doctors would recommend "5-Hour Energy". Also, the suggestions were focused towards "healthy patients who use energy supplements". Who would be considered healthy? A person with a respectable BMI and works out regularly? Not only do they recommend them to healthy people, but to healthy people who already use energy supplements.
It gets really interesting when we look into the fine print. 73% of doctors may recommend a low calorie energy supplement, but only 56% would actually suggest 5-Hour ENERGY. Of primary care physicians, only 47% would suggest 5-Hour ENERGY specifically to healthy patients already using energy supplements. Basically, the ad is stating that for people who already use energy supplements, 3/4 of doctors surveyed said they should use a low calorie supplement rather than high calorie supplements. Focusing on the calories also veers the consumer away from looking at the ridiculous amount of sugar in other energy supplements. Only 1/2 of the doctors would actually suggest 5-Hour ENERGY, meaning the other half of doctors suggested an alternative to 5-Hour ENERGY, and again, that's to people who already use supplements! For me, this ad was a horrible representation of the product, causing consumers to wonder and worry, rather than relax and find reassurance. Consumers prefer statistics to be in the 90th percentile towards A quality, not at a C- or F, like the commercial is implying. Rather than sparking interest in consumers, this ad fueled concerns.
This commercial is a perfect example of "weasel words", where the manufacturer suggests a positive meaning without making any guarantees. At first the ad seems positive with the large stack of reviews on the product, but who can tell if those are actual reviews or just a stack of paper with a couple reviews printed for the top. The spokesperson said, "Over 73% of doctors would recommend a low calorie energy supplement to their healthy patients who use energy supplements". She didn't say that 73% of doctors would recommend "5-Hour Energy". Also, the suggestions were focused towards "healthy patients who use energy supplements". Who would be considered healthy? A person with a respectable BMI and works out regularly? Not only do they recommend them to healthy people, but to healthy people who already use energy supplements.
It gets really interesting when we look into the fine print. 73% of doctors may recommend a low calorie energy supplement, but only 56% would actually suggest 5-Hour ENERGY. Of primary care physicians, only 47% would suggest 5-Hour ENERGY specifically to healthy patients already using energy supplements. Basically, the ad is stating that for people who already use energy supplements, 3/4 of doctors surveyed said they should use a low calorie supplement rather than high calorie supplements. Focusing on the calories also veers the consumer away from looking at the ridiculous amount of sugar in other energy supplements. Only 1/2 of the doctors would actually suggest 5-Hour ENERGY, meaning the other half of doctors suggested an alternative to 5-Hour ENERGY, and again, that's to people who already use supplements! For me, this ad was a horrible representation of the product, causing consumers to wonder and worry, rather than relax and find reassurance. Consumers prefer statistics to be in the 90th percentile towards A quality, not at a C- or F, like the commercial is implying. Rather than sparking interest in consumers, this ad fueled concerns.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)